the feminist librarian reads

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • ask me
Abortion, in Pollitt’s view, must be seen not as a moral compromise requested by poor, weak women—we’re sorry, and we promise we’ll make it rare, but please, forgive us, we’ll still need it in extremis— but as a positive doctrine of women’s control over their own bodies, and of their own lives and destinies. Abortion, she insists, is a right integral to women’s own autonomy, not a privilege to be used as infrequently as possible. The Clintons’ shrewd formula—“Safe, legal, and rare”—may have been born of political necessity, but it misstates the truth. Abortion need not promise to be rare to be secured as safe and legal. One of the greatest moral achievements of human history—the full emancipation of women—should not be seconded to a metaphysical intuition, one with no scientific support or even coherent meaning: that a fertilized egg makes the same moral claims as an entire person.
Arguing Abortion - The New Yorker

Source: newyorker.com

  • 8 years ago
  • 9
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

9 Notes/ Hide

  1. deathorthetoypiano reblogged this from aeide-thea
  2. deathorthetoypiano liked this
  3. redheadbouquet liked this
  4. aeide-thea reblogged this from feministlibrarian
  5. youarecominggoing liked this
  6. aeide-thea liked this
  7. motivatedslacker liked this
  8. feministlibrarian posted this
← Previous • Next →

About

Librarian, historian, queer feminist, #fanfic author, wife, w/cats. she/her. for original thoughts find me on Twitter @feministlib.

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • ask me
  • Mobile
Effector Theme — Tumblr themes by Pixel Union