The nuance and fluidity of human sexual experience makes it hard to effectively categorize and analyze. ‘You say, okay, I’m going to get some gay people and I’m going to test whether their brains are different or something,” Walters said. “You already presume to know what is gay and who is gay. If someone has desires to act on it, are they in that study’s sample? If they act on it, but they don’t declare themselves, they don’t feel that’s who they are in their everyday lives, are they in the sample? If they’ve had both sets of experiences, are they in the sample? If someone says, I’m a lesbian, but boy do I get turned on by gay male porn, are they in that sample? It narrows the vast complexity and richness of human sexuality to think that there is some simple one or the other way of looking at it: gay, straight, this desire, that desire. And it flies in the face of both our history and other cultural experiences.’
Source: New York Magazine
16 Notes/ Hide
feistykitty liked this wrap-me-in-your-cinnamon liked this
mostlyfeministthings reblogged this from feminist-submissive chaosanddisorientation reblogged this from feminist-submissive
counting-casualties reblogged this from feminist-submissive
counting-casualties liked this
frances-annese reblogged this from feminist-submissive
frances-annese liked this
feminist-submissive reblogged this from feministlibrarian
feminist-submissive liked this
notentirely liked this darneareads liked this
anythingforaquietlife-blog liked this
feministlibrarian posted this