the feminist librarian reads

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • ask me
Neither the physical reality nor the emotional aftermath of pregnancy fit into our neat little categories for how society is organised. It produces something of immeasurable value yet it has no immediate monetary worth. It is hard, dangerous work yet it involves no skill and can be endured by even the most reluctant of participants. Whether or not one can gestate is not decided by any moral or physical examination; we may talk of “blessings” but what we really mean is “luck”. Pregnancy creates something from one’s own flesh, with lasting physical aftershocks, yet one does not own it. A baby is not one’s own self. Yet in the twenty-first century we have started to behave as though something so complex can be traded on a market whose very foundations rest on global inequality and the unpaid labour of women.
The feminist history of surrogacy: should pregnancy give a woman rights over a baby?

Source: newstatesman.com

  • 7 years ago
  • 11
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

11 Notes/ Hide

  1. synaloepha liked this
  2. alwaystrifecta reblogged this from claraxbarton
  3. alwaystrifecta liked this
  4. claraxbarton reblogged this from feministlibrarian
  5. jaydotdice reblogged this from feministlibrarian
  6. jaydotdice liked this
  7. clandestineclemintine liked this
  8. radi0active-sunrise reblogged this from feministlibrarian
  9. eviloverlibrarian liked this
  10. homeisaquestion liked this
  11. radi0active-sunrise liked this
  12. feministlibrarian posted this
← Previous • Next →

About

Librarian, historian, queer feminist, #fanfic author, wife, w/cats. she/her. for original thoughts find me on Twitter @feministlib.

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • ask me
  • Mobile
Effector Theme — Tumblr themes by Pixel Union