the feminist librarian reads

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • ask me

At its heart, though, this argument isn’t about what the Constitution, particularly the religion clauses, mean. It’s an argument about biblical supremacy over civil law. It’s an argument over who has “authority” or “jurisdiction” to decide matters relating to the United States citizenry.

To say that Huckabee or Davis seek to erase the separation of church and state misses the point. What they mean to say is not that the government should endorse a particular religion. They mean to say that the government should step aside for a particular religion.

The Only Religion Question Reporters and Debate Moderators Should Ask Presidential Candidates (Kim Davis Edition) | Religion Dispatches

Source: religiondispatches.org

  • 7 years ago
  • 2
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

2 Notes/ Hide

  1. justonesyllable liked this
  2. quxcksilvers liked this
  3. feministlibrarian posted this
← Previous • Next →

About

Librarian, historian, queer feminist, #fanfic author, wife, w/cats. she/her. for original thoughts find me on Twitter @feministlib.

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • ask me
  • Mobile
Effector Theme — Tumblr themes by Pixel Union