Taking the state defendants’ position to its logical conclusion, the empirical evidence at hand should require that only rich, educated, suburban-dwelling, married Asians may marry, to the exclusion of all other heterosexual couples. Obviously the state has not adopted
this policy and with good reason. The absurdity of such a requirement is self-evident. Optimal academic outcomes for children cannot logically dictate which groups may marry.
Source: equalitymi.org
21 Notes/ Hide
jaydotdice reblogged this from feministlibrarian
boomahboomah liked this
summersomeone liked this
crystalspyryt liked this
inmi liked this
sblaufuss liked this
jamietie liked this
isay liked this
pinkabrinka liked this
blissandzen liked this
heyhope liked this
door liked this
hikergirl liked this do-over liked this
tbridge reblogged this from notentirely and added:
That’s a really great conclusion. It’s doubly great when you find out it comes from a judge appointed by Reagan.
notentirely liked this - notentirely reblogged this from feministlibrarian
feministlibrarian posted this