the feminist librarian reads

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • ask me
No two minds could be less alike than those of the great nineteenth-century scientist and the latter-day evangelist for atheism. Hesitant, doubtful, and often painfully perplexed, Darwin understood science as an empirical investigation in which truth is never self-evident and theories are always provisional. If science, for Darwin, was a method of inquiry that enabled him to edge tentatively and humbly toward the truth, for Dawkins, science is an unquestioned view of the world. The Victorians are often mocked for their supposed certainties, when in fact many of them (Darwin not least) were beset by anxieties and uncertainties. Dawkins, by contrast, seems never to doubt for a moment the capacity of the human mind—his own, at any rate—to resolve questions that previous generations have found insoluble.
An Appetite for Wonder Review: The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins | New Republic

Source: newrepublic.com

  • 8 years ago
  • 4
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

4 Notes/ Hide

  1. coffeeandadanish liked this
  2. cryingleo reblogged this from padaviya
  3. padaviya reblogged this from feministlibrarian
  4. thereallifelizlemon liked this
  5. feministlibrarian posted this
← Previous • Next →

About

Librarian, historian, queer feminist, #fanfic author, wife, w/cats. she/her. for original thoughts find me on Twitter @feministlib.

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • ask me
  • Mobile
Effector Theme — Tumblr themes by Pixel Union